Tuesday, October 9, 2012

The Patent, Used as a Sword: An Outtake From the 1980s ...

In the long narrative tour of the patent system published on Monday, ?The Patent, Used as a Sword,? one story line is the strategy of Apple as it seeks to fend off competition in the smartphone market. Apple?s main rival, of course, is Google and the handset makers that use its Android software.

For Apple, the pioneering innovator in smartphones, patents are a means to an end. Its goal is not money ? at least not so much in the short-term sense of extracting licensing revenues. Instead, Apple is trying to use its patent portfolio as a weapon for competitive advantage. If Apple can force rivals to redesign their products, Apple can slow down Samsung and others.

Apple?s ?sacred stuff,? as one former company executive put it, is its technology that controls the user experience of the iPhone and iPad, the look-and-feel features.

More than a quarter of a century ago, Apple found itself in a patent negotiation with the most powerful technology company of its day, I.B.M., shortly after Steve Jobs had been forced out.

By the mid-1980s, the I.B.M. PC, introduced in 1981, had been mimicked by clone makers, led by Compaq. I.B.M. was making the rounds collecting intellectual-property rent from the other companies in the personal computer business, starting with Apple, the unclone. The computer giant wanted money, yet it had a strategic agenda as well.

An I.B.M. team showed up at Apple?s headquarters in Cupertino, Calif., armed with a big pile of documents, patents it claimed Apple might be infringing. Apple had its own stack of patents, but far smaller than I.B.M.?s pile. So Apple owed I.B.M. some money, if far less than the clone makers would pay in their cross-licensing deals with I.B.M.

But I.B.M. had one other demand. In the contract between the two companies, I.B.M. insisted that Apple pledge it would not make a computer larger than a standard government desk.

?It was one of their hot buttons ? I.B.M. was concerned that Apple would compete with them in mainframes,? recalled Irving Rappaport, former associate general counsel for intellectual property at Apple. ?We just laughed.?

Source: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/08/the-patent-used-as-a-sword-an-outtake-from-the-1980s/

saints vs 49ers vanessa marcil 49 ers frank gore frank gore nfl games jesus montero

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.